Skip to main content

Recently there has been a lot of media attention focused on actress Ashley Judd involving a potential bid for Senate against the unpopular and potentially vulnerable senate minority leader Mitch McConnell in Kentucky. So far no other big names have entered the field and it is possible that Judd might end up our nominee by default. Her supporters praise her for having the courage to run as a liberal in a conservative state and to fight for progressive ideals against the ultimate senate bogeyman.

But make no mistake, Ashley Judd cannot win.

You see, Judd, while being a perfectly fine liberal, is opposed to mountaintop removal and has some not so nice things to say about King Coal. That would be a huge plus if she were running in Vermont, after all mountaintop removal is a terrible thing, but her position makes her dead on arrival in coal heavy Kentucky. Why? Look at any of the recent statewide races below president in Kentucky and what are some of the Democrats' best counties in almost all of them? That's right, the heavily unionized but still conservative coal ones. They vote Democratic at even higher rates than the much more urban and diverse counties holding Louisville and Lexington. But what about a Democrat who supports the national platform on coal/the environment such as President Obama? He does astoundingly worse in those same coal counties and only retains those urban ones. So mark my words, with her opposition to coal, Judd just cannot win. At best she'll be a drain of resources that might go to winnable races and at worst she could drag down the whole ticket, causing us to lose control of the state house or representatives.

So why do I support Ashley Judd running for Congress after all that? Well there's this other district she could run in and it's near her actual home in the state of Tennessee where she resides. You see there's this conservative incumbent there whom Judd could beat and easily win a seat in congress. What is this seat you say?

None other than Jim Cooper's TN-05 in Nashville.

Yep that's right, the same Jim Cooper who was the only "Democrat" to vote against relief for Superstorm Sandy victims.
The same Jim Cooper whose dickishness helped sink the Clinton Health Care plan.
The same Jim Cooper who has a fetish for deficit hawkery.
The same Jim Cooper who is anti-choice.
The list goes on and on and all of this is from a district that Obama won by 13% and hasn't sent a Republican to congress since Reconstruction.

It's high time we replaced this worthless Blue Dog asshole with a real progressive and if Ashley Judd wants to truly fight for liberal ideas and actually accomplish something she should be pragmatic and run for Congress in TN-05 and rid us of one of the few true conservadems in a safe seat. With her movie star power, Judd will easily have the funds to be competitive when local elected officials otherwise would not.

So Ashley Judd for congress. Retire Blue Dog Cooper.

Originally posted to Stephen Wolf on Thu Feb 21, 2013 at 09:44 AM PST.

Also republished by Three Star Kossacks.


Should Ashley Judd run against Jim Cooper?

68%131 votes
18%35 votes
13%25 votes

| 191 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site