Skip to main content

This diary was crossposted from RedRacingHorses. I'll once again be on the record as saying that I'm one of the last holdovers from DKE's SwingStateProject days and only post under the DKElections section (and I don't get into policy).
NOTE: DKE's page width is too narrow for my pictures and spreadsheets to come up unobstructed. Use the spreadsheet I created on Google Drive for data.

Here's the Boston Red Sox's theme song by quite the Massachusetts band, the Dropkick Murphys.

My favorite Scott Brown ad, and the absolute turning point of his 2010 campaign.


Scott Brown shocked the world through winning the 2010 special election for Ted Kennedy's old US Senate seat. In 2012, Brown had two real options as to which coalition he could try to forge to reach 50.1% of the statewide vote. Brown's first option was to outrun generic Republicans in the middle class to wealthy suburbs and exurbs around Boston, Worcester, Providence, and Springfield. Bill Weld's 1994 and Mitt Romney's 2002 gubernatorial races are excellent examples of when such a strategy worked well for a Republican candidate running statewide. Brown's other option was to follow Paul Cellucci's 1998 model of running ahead of generic Republicans in the ethnic, working class communities around the state, especially in Boston neighborhoods like South Boston and Dorchester, Boston suburbs like Quincy, Braintree, and Malden and mill towns like Lowell and Fitchburg while running strongly enough in but not necessarily focusing on exurban areas like Tewksbury and Norwood. Brown's 2010 coalition decidedly followed the first route, but his 2012 coalition failed in its attempts to replicate his overperformances. Brown needed to run, at worst, 2.29% behind his 2010 performance but ended up running 6.12% behind. Brown also needed to overperform Mitt Romney by 11.03% but only ran 8.63% ahead. Disappointingly, Brown ran sufficiently ahead of McCain in a grand total of 0 of the 15 regions, meaning that his underperformance of how he needed to perform was spread across the commonwealth. Democratic turnout was just too strong.

For the purposes of this diary, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has been broken down into 15 semi-geographical and semi-cultural political regions. Some are more geographical than others and some are more cultural than others, but they represent the different communities in the Bay State quite well.

Below the fold, the 15 political regions of Massachusetts will be explained and Brown's performance in 2010 and 2012 in each of them will be analyzed.

Massachusetts' 15 Political Regions


Data by Region


Note: Here's the spreadsheet I created on Google Documents.

Statewide Data


Region 1: The Berkshires, College Towns, and Summer Retreats


This region is mostly made up of Berkshire, Hampshire, and Franklin Counties in Western Massachusetts but the end of Cape Cod and Martha's Vineyard were tacked on because of their similar voting patterns and their common characteristics of being resort towns full of liberal artists and former hippies. Once competitive for the GOP, Appalachia without religion, as I like to think of it, with its college towns, artists, and rural poverty has rapidly slipped away from being competitive for the GOP in the past half century.

Region 1's Election Stats and Analysis


This region is the least Boston influenced of any area of the state. Scott Brown overperformed John McCain by the least of any of the 15 regions and overperformed Mitt Romney by the 14th most of the 15 regions. Romney didn't drop hard here, but he also didn't overperform very well here in either election. Brown did a little campaigning in Pittsfield, but wisely didn't spend much time here because of its reflexively Democratic nature. This area also trended nearly two points leftwards in PVI in 2012, seeing as John McCain did better than Mitt Romney here by .1%.

Region 2: Small Town Central Massachusetts


Region 2, which is comprised of classic small New England towns, is more economically stable and connected to the rest of the world than Region 1 is but is still outside the Boston bubble. It's politically moderate on a federal level and is fairly Republican on a state level, but, in the words of BostonPatriot, "it has a low BS meter--a slick Boston-area Republican like Weld won't run as well here. You could almost call this Baja New Hampshire. Brown is an exceptional fit for this region and had his second highest overperformance over McCain here."

Region 2's Election Stats and Analysis


Region 2 was the 2nd best region for Brown overperforming McCain in 2010 and the 5th best for his overperforming Romney in 2012, and Brown ran nearly 9 points ahead of Mitt Romney here. Needlessly to say, Brown did quite well in the small towns of central Massachusetts compared to Romney. This area also trended slightly rightwards Presidentially, but There was a lot of hope that Romney would do quite well here and that Brown would do better than his 6.39 point underperformance of his 2010 performance here. All else equal, Brown needed to run nearly 4 points better here. Out of the 15 regions, Brown's drop was 11th most dramatic here. Nevertheless, he ran strongly here.

Region 3: Suburbs of Worcester, Providence, and Springfield


While these suburbs lean Democratic, they are, of course, an important part of the GOP's coalition in Massachusetts. In BP's words, "There's more money here than in region 2, but it's not nearly as cosmopolitan as the Boston suburbs and you still have small-town sensibilities dominating the mindset. Another great region for Brown."

Region 3's Election Stats and Analysis


Brown's home region was another mixed bag for him in 2012, at least in terms of its comparison to his 2010 performance. His drop from his 2010 performance was 10th out of the 15 regions, and he dropped here more severely than he did in most regions. However, Brown ran nearly 9.5 points ahead of Mitt Romney here, making it his 2nd best performance as compared to Romney of any region in the state. This region was also fairly stable in terms of its presidential trend, seeing as Romney's performance over McCain here was only slightly higher than it was nationwide.

Region 4: I-495's Exurban Ring Around Boston

The Boston exurbs, like most exurbs, generally tend to be populated by a mix of wealthy whites who like spacious homes, large plots of land and upper middle income families who can't afford to live in affluent areas closer into the city (think of Andover as a perfect example of a town in this region). The commute from the 495 belt is atrocious by car but schools its are great, its towns are safe, and its communities are close knit. There are plenty of moderate, swingy voters here and any Republican running statewide has to overperform in the 495 belt in order to win. This region is also growing in population and in importance in statewide politics.

Region 4's Election Stats and Analysis


Romney ran nearly 10 points behind Brown here, and actually held up fairly well (though not as well as he needed to), only running about four points behind his strong 2010 performance. Region 4 was Brown's 4th best performance relative to McCain in 2010, but he obviously proved to these voters that he did a darn good job in office. This region definitely didn't disappoint in 2010.

Region 5: Blue Collar Conservatives


Region 5 is comprised of a mix of the Merrimack Valley's mill towns and the blue collar havens of Quincy and Weymouth on the South Shore. While I'm not sure if they were actually strongly Reagan Democrat towns, these towns are very ethnic and are largely populated by ConservaDems. Long thought to be trending Republican, Mitt Romney barely overperformed John McCain in this region. As BostonPatriot noted, "There would be a huge discrepancy between Brown-Markey and Weld-Lynch numbers here."

Region 5's Election Stats and Analysis


In 2010, Brown overperformed McCain most in this blue collar, heavily ethnic and Catholic. He ran an eye popping 19+% ahead here. However, he dropped the second most of any region here. Nevertheless, Brown did fairly well here but not well enough. At the same time, it trended slightly leftwards Presidentially, casting some doubt about the future of the GOP in the blue collar portions of MA.

Region 6: The Nawth Shaw

Region 6, the North Shore's affluent exurbs, has traditionally been the GOP's strongest region in Massachusetts. Affluent and spacious, towns like Boxford and Georgetown gave large margins to Richard Tisei and Scott Brown. Boxford was even the only town to vote against John Kerry when he ran for reelection against token opposition in 2008. Ipswich and Manchester-by-the-Sea are Democratic leaning, but Richard Tisei won both of them in his race for Congress. The North Shore, which is Republican leaning already, will swing heavily for a socially moderate, fiscally conservative Republican. If John Tierney loses in 2014, it's because this area will show up like gangbusters for Richard Tisei (even in a midterm).

Region 6's Election Stats and Analysis


Brown ran rather well on the North Shore, although he ran slightly behind his statewide average of Romney overperformance at 8.02%. He held up fairly well from his 2010 performance here, but his 2010 performance was not as strong as it was in some other suburban and exurban areas. That being said, Mitt Romney improved by nearly 5 points here over John McCain, doing impressively with the North Shore's swingy voters. That gave Brown less room to improve over Romney, so Brown's 8% overperformance was even more impressive when that fact is considered.

Region 7: Boston's Northern Suburbs

Region 7, Boston's northern suburbs, is a mix of blue collar and middle to upper-middle income towns. Reading, Marblehead, and Swampscott have quite a bit of old money. This area leans Democratic on a whole but but Republicans have to reach the mid-50's here to win statewide. This is a region where Weld and Romney '02 did better than Brown.

Region 7's Election Stats and Analysis


Continuing a familiar trend, Boston's northern suburbs were his 4th best performance in terms of overperforming John McCain. Brown overperformed Romney 4th most of any region here in 2012 and overperformed McCain 9th most here in 2010, so his performance relatively went up, and he held up well here.

Region 8: Boston's Northern Inner Ring Suburbs

Region 8 is comprised of the heavily ethnic, heavily blue collar towns north of Boston. Yes, Somerville isn't a great fit but isn't wealthy enough to fit into Region 9. The inner ring northern Boston suburbs are heavily Democratic leaning, but some see promise for the GOP in these towns. It's fairly ironic that such a heavily Catholic, working class area could spawn Ed Markey, a "resident" of Malden who is absolutely hellbent on creating new environmental regulations. Some white flight may be happening here, seeing as Mitt Romney did more than two points worse than John McCain did here, although McCain's personality was certainly a better fit than Romney's in this working class area.

Region 8's Election Stats and Analysis


Region 8 was one of the first areas that really killed Brown. His "Professah Warren" and "Lieawatha" schtick was tailor made for areas like this, full of culturally conservative, New Deal loving voters but it clearly didn't stick. Brown fell by nearly 7.5 points here and this region trended left to boot. He also ran relatively weakly here in 2010. Those calling for a blue collar future for the Mass GOP need to figure out why the "Professah Warren" thing didn't stick and how to grow the GOP in these towns, something I see as a fool's errand.

Region 9: Route 2 Corridor

(note: Newburyport and Nantucket not shown)
Region 9, comprised of the MetroWest/Route 2 corridor and Boston's wealthy streetcar suburbs like Cambridge, Brookline, and Newton, is generally rough territory for the GOP but will swing somewhat for a socially liberal, fiscally moderate Republican in the mold of Bill Weld. Heavily Jewish and highly affluent, Region 9 is home to tens of thousands of graduates of the Boston area's 50+ colleges who stayed to work in the area. This area is a lot like suburban DC in that its residents are less likely to have grown up in the area than other places. Succinctly, it's very transient.

Region 9's Election Stats and Analysis


The Route 2/Metrowest area (and Sharon and Newburyport thanks to their shared voting patterns and demographics) was mixed news for Brown in 2012. While he held up quite well here (and actually improved over 2010), despite his "Professah Warren schtick that was surely a turnoff to many potential voters here, he still underperformed what he needed to to win statewide. Nevertheless, Brown's populist appeal for regions 5, 8, 14, and parts of 14 didn't turn off these voters. His standing as a moderate, but not a moderate in a Weld/Romney mold, also didn't cause his share to drop here. Could he have tried to make some inroads here if he had styled himself differently or focused on these areas? I tend to think so, although showing some attention on this region alone won't win him a race statewide. It'd certainly help, though.

Region 10: Extremely Affluent Towns

Region 10 is a lot like Region 9 but even more affluent, less Jewish, and more Republican. While Democratic leaning, especially in Sudbury, the four towns of Winchester, Wellesley, Weston, and Sudbury are all winnable by the right Republican. A winning Republican, unless they are relying on overperformances in the blue collar regions, should carry this region.

Region 10's Election Stats and Analysis


This region was quite similar to region 9, although Brown performed better here on a whole than he did there seeing as these towns are more heavily GOP. Interestingly enough, both regions trended right although Region 10 trended 6 points rightward Presidentially (matching the trendlines of the wealthy Farmington Valley in neighboring Connecticut) while Region 19 trended just over two points rightward.

Region 11: Norfolk County's Boston suburbs

Region 11, southwest suburban/exurban Boston, is largely upper-middle income. Milton does not fit well into other regions, but outside of Milton this region is similar to region 7 but slightly wealthier and slightly more conservative. The GOP actually has a registration advantage in Dover, an absolute rarity in Massachusetts. This region swung hard towards Romney and it is indisputably trending Republican.

Region 11's Election Stats and Analysis


Like in other suburban Boston regions, Brown ran far ahead of Romney here. I'd have hoped that Mitt Romney would have improved over John McCain by more than the 2.21% that he did, but Brown ran a solid 8.69% ahead of Romney. A few of these towns were in his State Senate district.

Region 12: South Shore

The coastal towns of Region 12 are largely populated by upper middle class Irish Catholic, former Dorchester and South Boston residents who did well enough to move out onto the South Shore. The town of Scituate is actually supposedly the most heavily Irish town in the country. Hingham and Cohasset have more money than the rest of the South Shore, but there is definitely some affluence through the South Shore. This area is Bob Hedlund's base. This is one of the GOP's bread and butter (or steak and potatoes?) regions and will grow in importance as it trends right. Scott Brown's fundraising was eye popping here.

Region 12's Election Stats and Analysis


All in all, Region 12 was a winner for the GOP in 2012. Romney overperformed McCain by nearly 5 points here, and Brown outran Romney by over 8 points here, above his statewide average. Considering how many swing voters Romney won over here, Romney's overperformance here was downright impressive, even if he didn't quite reach the 9+% overperformances he reached elsewhere.

Region 13: Cranberry Country and the Cape

BostonPatriot explained this region, one I haven't been to for years, quite well. "These are small towns mostly outside the Boston bubble. Like the South Shore, it's pretty reliably Republican--you can draw a solid McCain congressional seat down here. Cape Cod can be tricky--they're very parochial and thoroughly moderate--but most of the Cape towns fit well with the rest of the region."

Region 13's Election Stats and Analysis


This region trended about a rightward compared to the nation as a whole in terms of Presidential numbers, but Brown's 7.64% performance here was unacceptable, especially seeing as he should have cleaned up against a MetroWest, urban progressive like Liz Warren both in conservative Cranberry Country and especially on moderate Cape Cod. Brown also fell 6.18% here in 2012, a disappointing drop in an area that he should have done well in.

Region 14: Minority Heavy Cities

Springfield, Lawrence, Brockton, Randolph, and the bulk of Boston are mostly non-white and are just awful for the GOP, especially in a Presidential year. Many were former manufacturing or mill towns that suffered from white flight. These areas are so poor and desolate that the GOP just has to hope they stay home so that they won't make up too high of a percentage of the statewide electorate. Brockton is emblematic of this region. Once heavily white ethnic and Catholic thanks to its shoe factories, whites left and the city is now heavily minority. The GOP has to hope that, like in Brockton, minority residents will stay home (like they generally do in midterms) and that the elderly white ethnic voters living here will turn out. This area's very similar in that way to Waterbury, Connecticut. Fall River and New Bedford heavily white but are so impoverished and unionized that they're in this region.

Region 14's Election Stats and Analysis


The best Brown could have hoped for here would have been lower turnout. If turnout had been lower in the heavily populated Region 14, Brown's 8-9.5% overperformances of Romney in most of the suburban regions of the state may well have been enough to propel him to victory. We've seen this pattern play out across New England in the Lynn dominated MA-06 race and in the Waterbury and New Britain dominated CT-05 race. The GOP just has to hope that these types of cities don't turn out well in a Presidential year, for whatever reason. That simply wasn't happening with Obama on the ticket, so Brown had an unreasonable haul elsewhere.

Region 15: Mill and Factory Towns

Region 15 is potentially a ticking time bomb for the GOP. While whiter and slightly--but noticeably--better off socioeconomically than Region 14, many of these towns (think Framingham, Lowell, and Worcester) have the same potential for white flight like the towns in 15 had. This is another heavily Catholic area the GOP can do quite well in, in a midterm, so long as the white population doesn't leave. Southie, Eastie, and parts of Dorchester would fit in well in this region but carving up Boston's precincts would have been a bit too time consuming for what I had time for. The results are similar, though. Additionally, just like in other New England states, the urban areas in the state trended Democratic by a scale of 3 PVI points (meaning McCain overperformed Romney by about a point while underperforming him by about two points nationwide).

Region 15's Election Stats and Analysis


Brown's reliance on Region 15 was troubling, especially seeing as it trended leftwards Presidentially both compared to the rest of the nation and in sheer percentages from McCain to Romney. White flight and the death of old, ethnic whites may be kicking in. Brown actually ran 8.5% ahead of Romney here, an impressive total, but the fact that it trended leftwards sheds some doubt on his clear focus on areas like this through his strategic Democratic endorsements of local elected officials, his frequent stops in these towns, and his "Professah Warren" and "Fauxcahontas" strategy. If these areas trend leftwards, even more focus may need to be spent on the Boston suburbs and exurbs and the suburbs of the other cities of the state.


I don't want to say too much here in order to encourage a robust discussion of Brown's strategy, the future of the MA GOP, and Brown's electoral future and the strategies he should use in running those races. However, what I took away from this race is that...

  1. Scott Brown's "Professah Warren" rhetoric and his going after Warren hard until the end for her sue of her 1/32nd Indian heritage did not help him in the blue collar areas of the state like he thought it should have. At the same time, Brown performed fairly strongly for a Republican in MetroWest/the Route 2 corridor and in Boston's limousine liberal streetcar suburbs.
  2. Brown probably did well enough in most of the suburban areas of the state, as well as in central Massachusetts, as he needed to, even as the blue collar areas he targeted were generally elusive. This strong performance in the suburbs came even as Brown clearly focused on those areas while campaigning and through his overall strategy.
  3. Urban turnout was probably too strong for Brown to win in 2012, although Boston Mayor Tom Menino sitting on his hands instead of giving a half hearted endorsement to Warren could have helped cut down Warren's margin in Boston.

What were your takeaways from the race? Please leave your feedback and let's discuss Scott Brown's future along with the future of the Massachusetts GOP and the strategies it should employ!

Note: a special thanks goes out to RRH mod BostonPatriot for breaking down the regions for me so precisely using DRA and for giving me his take on the various regions. While I had a fairly good idea as to which towns would constitute these areas, BP's insight and local knowledge was critical in writing this diary.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  It wasn't a half-hearted endorsement (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    pademocrat, JBraden, HoosierD42

    you don't cut an ad where you sing the person's praises and coordinate hard with labor leaders to GOTV if you only give a half-hearted endorsement.

    Age 23. Voting in NJ-03. Lived most of life in NJ-01. Had Rush Holt represent me during my undergrad years and am now represented by Frank Pallone in my grad school.

    by KingofSpades on Mon Jan 14, 2013 at 09:10:07 AM PST

  •  I enjoy reading these breakdowns. (6+ / 0-)

    I think that MA just reverted back to normal voting habits. Brown's 2010 win was just the definition of a fluke, IMHO.

    Farm boy, 20, who hit the city to go to college, WI-03 (home, voting), WI-02 (college), -6.75, -3.18, One of 1,620,985 Wisconsinites to re-elect Barack Obama, and one of 1,547,104 Wisconsinites to send Tammy Baldwin to the US Senate!!!

    by WisJohn on Mon Jan 14, 2013 at 09:46:34 AM PST

    •  That's a big part of it. MA tends to... (4+ / 0-) redder in in-state elections than in Federal elections. The attitude seems to be based in a desire to limit the power (and sometimes corruption, in the sense that power corrupts) of the state Dems, but to support Federal liberals.

      Ultimately, the mammal-guano insanity of the national GOP came home to roost for Scott, and for Tisei. What might, in another era, have been a preference for newer blood became: "We've got to stop these crazies in Congress!" It became clear that a vote for any Republican was a vote for Boehner, McConnell, the Teabaggers, obstructionism and generally despicable people and policies.

      And Brown's debate statement in support of Scalia just underlined that point in crimson: suddenly even MA Indies realized how important it is to keep these loons away from the Supreme Court.

      Best advice now for Scott: run for Governor, for state senate, for dogcatcher -- for anything where you're not going to be voting on SCOTUS nominees!

      NEW PALINDROMIC METAPHOR MEANING TO MAKE A PREDICTION THAT IS ASTOUNDINGLY OFF TARGET: "Pull a Gallup!" As in: "The weatherman said yesterday would be sunny and mild, but we got a foot of snow! Boy, did he pull a Gallup!"

      by Obama Amabo on Mon Jan 14, 2013 at 10:35:44 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  We'll see (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      when Brown wins again in an off-year election.

      Good luck getting him out of the seat after that.

      •  And why would he (5+ / 0-)

        when the state Dem party know how not to take it for granted and got their act together last year?  Also, he lost by more than expected in 2012 to a political neophyte who had never been elected to office before.  Partially it was due to Warren's ability to really step it up after Labor Day, partially it was Brown's inability to capture lightning in a bottle twice.  His pickup truck ads were running when she surged again in the polling after the DNC and he switched to trying to press the Native American issue (which she initially mishandled) when nobody cared anymore.  Furthermore, Dems no longer control the whole legislature these days (nor do they have 60 Senators) so he can't sell himself as a balance anymore.  Finally, he may not run for Senate this time.  Consider that he ran in 2010 and 2012 and if he runs again with the intention of winning, he'll have to consider the fact that he'll have to run in 2013 and 2014.  Quite a tall order when he could go for Governor instead.  I guess some of what he does depends on who gets elected Mass GOP chair.  It's between his finance vice chair and some more conservative businessman.  The base wants the businessman and he seems more likely.

        Age 23. Voting in NJ-03. Lived most of life in NJ-01. Had Rush Holt represent me during my undergrad years and am now represented by Frank Pallone in my grad school.

        by KingofSpades on Mon Jan 14, 2013 at 01:14:57 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  Dropkick Murphies? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Bonus points to see a Republican poster including such an overtly left wing band in a diary (although I didn't see their video in the diary over at RRH!).

    Quite a good analysis overall of MA voting patterns and the Senate race. There might be some quibbling about whether specific town belong in certain categories - but such distinctions are always artificial. I would note that you've got a tendency to lump heavily Democratic areas into much larger population clumps than swing areas more favourable to Republicans - there are greater distinctions that could be made within some of these areas as well if you wanted to focus more attention on them.

    And I would argue that there is a problem when the electoral strategy for MA Republicans is dependent on lower turnout by minorities and urban dwellers - not healthy for a party or for democracy in general, and the first step on the slippery slope of wanting voter suppression.  

    My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we’ll change the world - Jack Layton

    by terjeanderson on Tue Jan 15, 2013 at 11:19:38 AM PST

  •  Strange seeing what you did with Attleboro (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    The area around in Bristol County in it's immediate environs is traditional Republican territory that was represented by former Republican Speaker of the House Joe Martin.  Years later he was replaced by Margaret Heckler who upset him in a Republican primary.  The seat only fell into Democratic hands when it was gerrymandered into Barney Franks district.

    While I enjoyed your diary you do a disservice dividing up Northern Bristol County up the way you do.

    The lady was enchanted and said they ought to see. So they charged her with subversion and made her watch TV -Spirogyra

    by Taget on Thu Jan 17, 2013 at 02:51:53 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site