Skip to main content

Since this week seems to be "dust off your old fantasy maps week" on DKE, I wanted to post this beauty I constructed using the state's partisan average of 2004-2008 statewide races as a guide.  Unlike the actual, horrific looking GOP gerrymander that whittled us down to just 5 seats to their 13, this map reverses that ratio.  While it's clearly gerrymandered, none of the districts comes remotely close to being as ugly as the actual 7th district, among others.  Again, keep in mind that I'm relying on the partisan average rather than Obama numbers because Obama underperforms local Dems significantly in southwestern Pennsylvania and overperforms considerably in the Philadelphia suburbs.

Photobucket
(click through for larger size)
Photobucket

Photobucket

1st - Bob Brady (D) The 1st gets unpacked by dropping heavily Democratic parts of Delaware County and Hispanic parts of northeastern Philly in exchange for heavily conservative Pennsylvania Dutch country.  A year and a half ago I would have said this was a flagrant VRA violation, but the real map dropped the black percentage drastically as well so...  Anyway, Brady no longer has to worry about a primary challenge from a black Dem (though I may have drawn his home out, not that it matters).
Safe D

2nd - Chaka Fattah (D) This seat also needed to be unpacked which is hard since it has to be majority black.  This is the only Dem vote sink on the map but I used it to utterly dismantle Jim Gerlach's old seat.  Now it's just ridiculously Democratic instead of among the top 5 in the nation.
Safe D

3rd - Open (R-held) This district is the weakest of all the Dem seats thanks to it being open.  Though it's technically the district of Mike Kelly (R), he would run in the neighboring 18th which is a GOP vote sink and contains his base as well as the bulk of his constituents in the primary.  Given how Obama held up relatively well in Erie, I'm confident we'd have picked this up, whether with Kathy Dahlkemper or maybe someone a little more liberal.
Lean D pickup

4th - Jason Altmire (D) Altmire might actually hate this since it gets about 12% more Democratic than his old seat, but if he moved to the left and started voting like Mike Doyle I think he could have survived a primary since there's no Mark Critz.  Anyway this is beyond safe D given how strong Altmire is in the suburbs north of Pittsburgh, but it would be safe Dem even if it's open.
Safe D

5th - Open (Scott Perry-R)
This GOP vote sink takes the place of the old 19th/new 4th and is essentially the same seat minus parts of York.  Scott Perry won the actual 4th, so he'd probably win the primary here.
Safe R

6th - Jim Gerlach (R)
I honestly think Gerlach would have bailed on this seat for the 16th or statewide office seeing as he represented very little of it previously and it's over 7% more Dem than his old one and 12% more than his actual new one.  Either way though, neither he nor any other Republican is winning here and the real action would be in the Dem primary.
Safe D pickup

7th - Pat Meehan (R)
Unlike Gerlach, Meehan is not nearly as entrenched in a blue seat and thus his seat is less Dem than the 6th.  Still, it's quite Democratic at D+4 compared to statewide and nearly 10% more Dem than his real seat.  Meehan would undoubtedly put up a fight, but he wouldn't win.
Likely D pickup

8th - Mike Fitzpatrick (R)
Fitzpatrick gets a significantly different seat by swapping upper Bucks County for northeast Philly and accordingly his district gets 10% more Democratic than the one where he won 56.6% of the vote, so I have no doubt that he'd lose.  Interestingly, this is the only eastern PA district where Obama actually underperformed the Dem average.
Likely D pickup

9th - Bill Shuster (R)
The second GOP vote sink gets packed even further than the old 9th and far more than the new one.  Shuster would be strongly favored in the primary though as no other incumbent Republican has much base to run on.
Safe R

10th - Tom Marino (R) vs. Glenn "GT" Thompson (R)
GOP vote sink number 3 sees the other member vs member GOP primary, though this one is thanks to reapportionment.  If Thompson could make hay out of Marino's past ethics issues he might be able to keep it close or eke out a win, but the geography here heavily favors Marino.  Fine by me since he'll never win statewide.
Safe R

11th - Lou Barletta (R)
This seat is just a tad more Democratic than either the old version or what a fair map might produce and is 11.5% more Dem than the one where Barletta won 58.5% this year vs. a 3rd tier candiate.  Furthermore, it gives Barletta's base of Hazelton to the 17th and without a damaged incumbent to run against Barletta would be toast.
Likely D pickup

12th - Mark Critz (D)
This seat is the only Dem one on the map that McCain won, but it's nearly 6% more Dem than the one Critz nearly won this year and contains much more of his old district.  I had wanted to boost the Dem % a little bit more, but the lines became too ridiculous looking.  Most importantly, this district and the neighboring 18th try to prevent fellow incumbent Tim Murphy (R) from posing a serious threat to Critz.  Were Murphy to run here, Critz would still be a strong favorite seeing as Murphy only represents 23% of the district to Critz's 66.5% and in the actual 12th, Critz nearly won despite previously representing just 29% of it.
Likely D

13th - Allyson Schwartz (D)
The 13th gets unpacked about 4% from reality to help out the other Dem pick ups.  It's still nearly 3% more Dem than Schwartz's old district and she or any other Dem would have no trouble winning here.
Safe D

14th - Mike Doyle (D)
Along with Altmire, Doyle might dislike this one, but it's still safe D, not really trending right, and allows Altmire to be much better on economic issues (or just get primaried by an actual Democrat).
Safe D

15th - Harvey Charlie Dent (R)
This is the last Democratic pick up and like Gerlach would be in a more Republican district (than his old one) Dent is pretty well entrenched.  This seat drops the most conservative parts of the Lehigh Valley district and adds heavily Democratic Reading to give Dent a district that is 5% more Democratic than his old one and 9% more Democratic than the one he won this year with 56.7% against a some dude.  Like Fitzpatrick, Dent would certainly put up a fight but would ultimately lose.
Likely D pick up

16th - Joe Pitts (R)
This is the 4th GOP vote sink and draws a heavily Republican seat in Pennsylvania Dutch country.  Pitts would almost certainly run here but since it contains a ton of new territory he would almost certainly face a credible primary challenge.
Safe R

17th - Tim Holden (D)
This is hands down my favorite Democratic district in the map (though the 12th is a runner up).  It's clearly the most gerrymandered on the map and looks kind of like an upside down hammerhead tortoisegiraffe.  It draws Holden's base of Holdengrad Schuylkill County and Harrisburg from his old district together with the Democratic inner parts of Lancaster and York as well as Barletta's base in Hazelton.  Holden is much better positioned to win the primary here despite the district getting 9% more Dem than his old one since it contains a lot of his old district and doesn't have a lot of established Democrats in the new section. Obama overperformed local Dems who aren't Holden in this district, but thanks to Holden's lock on Schuylkill County this seat is his as long as he wants it.
Safe D

18th - Tim Murphy (R) vs. Mike Kelly (R)
This 5th and last GOP vote sink is also my hands down favorite Republican district since it draws together two Republican incumbents while preventing them from threatening Dems in their neighboring/old districts.  It draws Murphy's base in southern Allegheny County in with Kelly's base in Butler County and though Kelly represents more of the district, Murphy is much more established and a lot of the constituents are new to each.
Safe GOP

So there you have it.  13 districts that would have been pretty solid for Democrats in 2012, up from the 7 we had beforehand and the 5 we won in reality.  All of the eastern PA districts would be solid until the next redistricting, while the 3rd, 4th, and 14th, would likely remain stagnant.  Only the 12th is clearly trending away from us, but hopefully Critz would have been able to get entrenched there like Holden was in the 17th.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    WisJohn, sacman701, BeloitDem

    NC-06/NC-04; -9.00, -8.41; progress through pragmatism

    by sawolf on Fri Dec 14, 2012 at 08:45:05 AM PST

  •  that district 2 of yours is ridiculous (0+ / 0-)

    it crosses 6 counties, some of which are vastly culturally different from each other.

    district 1 for that matter!

    I think this would get challenged in court, had it come to pass (but it'd have required people to actually turn out in 2010 and vote D, and that just didn't happen in either case.)

    pseudoscience can kill

    by terrypinder on Fri Dec 14, 2012 at 08:56:52 AM PST

  •  This is an excellent map (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    sawolf, Englishlefty

    It's similar to the map I have drawn in some ways and different in other ways.

    First, I feel that your cracking of Philadelphia with six districts almost borders on baconmandering. I think there should be two districts entirely in Philadelphia.

    Two, you split Bucks County. This is a serious no-no. And in case you're wondering, it is possible to create a safely Democratic district without splitting Bucks County. Just extend an arm into North Philly, and you can get the district up to 57.5% Obama.

    Third, trying to keep four Democratic districts in Western Pennsylvania is asking for a dummymander. District 12 will only move away from us as the decade progresses, and Mark Critz could be the next Ben Chandler with that district, especially since that district probably voted around 57% for Romney. I prefer three completely solid Democratic districts. And by the way, I like your 3rd district a lot; it's very similar to mine.

    Finally, I really like your 17th. It's an excellent and original idea, and it's a very interesting way to deal with Holden. My map deals with Holden yet another way.

    Overall, excellent work!

    (-8.38, -4.72), CT-02 (home), new ME-01 (college) "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one." -Spock

    by ProudNewEnglander on Fri Dec 14, 2012 at 09:28:38 AM PST

    •  Well yeah, this map wasn't supposed to be (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      James Allen, Englishlefty

      what PA Democrats would draw, just what I thought would be the best map given our incumbency strength (Holden/Critz) and trying to maximize liberalness elsewhere.  Also while I could have kept Bucks whole, there's really no way to get it remotely close to 60% Dem average without splitting it and Fitzpatrick is a relatively strong incumbent and I'd rather have a dyed in the wool liberal win than another Patrick Murphy, as awesome as he was for the old 8th.

      I specifically made sure that all 4 suburban/collar PA districts we don't hold were over 60% Obama too so that they're truly safe if straight ticket voting trends continue.

      With Critz I certainly didn't intend to draw it that way at first, it's just that it's Impossible to draw say, 3 60% Obama districts without going nuts with the lines.  Plus, I figured the Altmire and Doyle districts would be safe for the next 10 years and we could just cede a seat then.  There's no point in packing the districts far beyond the Obama performance when local Democrats do significantly better and Critz put up a strong performance this year all things considered.  I don't see how he'd have lost this year with that district since he nearly won the actual one.  Even Murphy's incumbency has it's limits and the district is significantly more Dem than Murphy's old one anyway.

      NC-06/NC-04; -9.00, -8.41; progress through pragmatism

      by sawolf on Fri Dec 14, 2012 at 04:36:30 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Considering what we actually have here in PA... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    WisJohn

    ...seeing this just makes me depressed.  

    •  you need a Democratic governor (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      GoUBears

      and as many Democratic state legislators as possible.  Just have a Dem governor and enough legislators to prevent a veto-proof majority in 2021 in order to force a balanced map.

      ...better the occasional faults of a government that lives in a spirit of charity, than the consistent omissions of a government frozen in the ice of its own indifference. -FDR, 1936

      by James Allen on Fri Dec 14, 2012 at 10:18:02 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  The 17th. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    James Allen, dufffbeer

    It's kind of pointless to include Schuylkill County now that Holden has been defeated. I am sure that you can draw an urban Harrisburg-York-Lancaster-Hershey district that would elect a liberal Democrat.

    I have always wanted an Erie-State College gerrymander!

    http://www.snappac.org/ Students for a New American Politics!

    by redrelic17 on Fri Dec 14, 2012 at 10:15:30 AM PST

    •  You do realize (0+ / 0-)

      that Holden is only 55? He could easily make a comeback if the right district was drawn.

      (-8.38, -4.72), CT-02 (home), new ME-01 (college) "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one." -Spock

      by ProudNewEnglander on Fri Dec 14, 2012 at 10:40:30 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Not really, my point of departure was this year (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Englishlefty

      So Holden would have been running as an incumbent, but either way he would win this district.  Obama also overperformed significantly in Lancaster and York, as you'll notice the average is slightly more Republican than the state at large.  Also I believe Holden would have moved left to become a moderate Democrat and would have voted for things like Obamacare if he had a district this safe.

      Mainly it's just that Holden would never win by less than 15-20 points in that district while a standard liberal would have to run some tough races in years like 2010 especially.  I just didn't see any reason to throw away his ability to lock down somewhat conservative Schuylkill County and it lets me make the 11th stronger for Dems by absorbing Barletta's base.

      NC-06/NC-04; -9.00, -8.41; progress through pragmatism

      by sawolf on Fri Dec 14, 2012 at 04:31:45 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  still looks better than the actual map (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    HoosierD42

    still better than what the Republicans got signed into law.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site