Skip to main content

I have noticed that there has been quite a bit of discussion here recently about the best way to redistrict Colorado. Although I am aware that mid-decade redistricting is illegal in Colorado, we can still imagine what the Democrats would be able to do if they could redraw Colorado, now that they have the trifecta. What makes Colorado even more interesting is that it will probably gain an 8th seat in 2020, so if Democrats still have the trifecta then we can see what they should do.

Colorado is actually a very enjoyable state to redistrict, because unlike in many other states, the Republicans are relatively concentrated in a few areas, while there are a lot of 55-60% Democratic areas. This makes a solid 5-2 map the way to go, and even if Colorado had 8 districts a 6-2 map is still relatively easy to draw. In these maps, all of the Democratic districts should be safe even in years like 2010.

So without further ado, let’s go over the fold and look at the maps!

Let’s begin with the 7-district map. Here is a map of the entire state:

And here is an inset of the Denver area:
District 1 (blue): This district contains the Eastern Slope, southern Douglas County, and Cañon City, but most of its population is in El Paso County, in or near Colorado Springs. This district is clearly a Republican vote sink, and a highly effective one, voting 64-35 McCain. The district is 80% white, 4% black, and 11% Hispanic VAP (all demographics below are in VAP). Although both Doug Lamborn and Cory Gardner live here, Lamborn would easily win the primary because it would be dominated by Colorado Springs voters. This district is beyond SAFE R.

District 2 (green): This district is a modified, and much more Democratic, version of Scott Tipton’s current district. It loses ultraconservative Mesa, Delta, and Montrose Counties to the 3rd district, and it gains the Democratic parts of Colorado Springs as well as some of the Democratic ski counties in central Colorado. The largest city here is Pueblo. This district is 70% white, 3% black, and 23% Hispanic, and it voted 57-41 for Obama in 2008. Both Tipton and his 2012 Democratic challenger, Sal Pace, live here, and without Grand Junction, Pace would easily defeat Tipton here. LIKELY D Pace vs. Tipton, SAFE D after that.

District 3 (purple): This district soaks up the remaining Republican areas in the state. It includes the rest of Douglas County and the rural eastern parts of Adams and Arapahoe Counties, then takes in most of Weld County except for Greeley, and then goes north and west along Colorado’s northern border to pick up the terrible trio of Mesa, Delta, and Montrose Counties. This district voted 61-38 for McCain, and it is 85% white, 1% black, and 10% Hispanic. Interestingly, no Republican incumbent lives here, so the Republican primary here would be interesting. Mike Coffman might run here if he thinks the 6th district is hopeless for him (which it is), but he might face a challenge from a Grand Junction Republican, or even a Weld County Republican like Ken Buck. Either way, whichever Republican wins the primary here would easily win the general. SAFE R.

District 4 (red): This district is the Boulder district, but it also contains Longmont, Fort Collins, Loveland, Greeley, and Broomfield, basically taking in the Democratic areas north of Denver. The district is 81% white, 1% black, and 14% Hispanic, and voted 61-37 for Obama in 2008. Jared Polis is from Boulder, and he would cruise here. SAFE D.

District 5 (yellow): This district is a modified version of Ed Perlmutter’s district, and it has about the same partisanship as the current one. It takes in most of Adams County, and then a small chunk of Aurora, some of the more conservative areas of Jefferson County (including Perlmutter’s hometown of Golden), Republican Park County, and the heavily Democratic Louisville/Lafayette area in Boulder County. This district is 68% white, 3% black, and 24% Hispanic, and voted 58-40 for Obama in 2008. Perlmutter would be safe here. SAFE D.

District 6 (teal): This district takes in the inner suburbs to the west, south, and east of Denver. It contains Lakewood, Englewood, most of Littleton and Centennial, and a lot of Aurora. The district is 71% white, 7% black, and 15% Hispanic. Mike Coffman lives here (in Aurora), but seeing as he only won by 1% in a district that voted 54-45 for Obama in 2008, while this district voted 57-41 for Obama in 2008, he would lose here. Joe Miklosi could hold down this district for as long as he wanted. LIKELY D Coffman vs. Miklosi, SAFE D after that.

District 7 (gray): This district contains all of the city of Denver, and then takes in some more conservative areas of Jefferson and Arapahoe Counties, including Ken Caryl/Columbine, Cherry Hills Village, and Greenwood Village. The district is 63% white, 8% black, and 24% Hispanic, and it voted 69-29 for Obama in 2008. Diana DeGette would be completely safe here. SAFE D.

So this map would provide a pretty solid 5-2 Democratic congressional delegation in pretty much all years. Which is far better than the 4-3 Republican delegation Colorado currently sends to the House.

Now, let’s take a look at the 8-district map. Here is a map of the whole state:

And here is an inset of the Denver area:
District 1 (blue): This vast, mostly rural district stretches from the northwestern to the southeastern tips of the state. It contains the Eastern Slope, then some eastern parts of Douglas County, then heavily Republican parts of Weld County, and then it goes west to take in the terrible trio of Mesa, Delta, and Montrose Counties. The district is 84% white, 1% black, and 12% Hispanic, and voted 64-34 for McCain. The only incumbent who lives here is Cory Gardner, and since this district has no one major population center, he should be mostly safe in a primary. SAFE R.

District 2 (green): This district is a modified version of Scott Tipton’s current district, and is similar to the 2nd district in the 7-district map. This district doesn’t take in as many Democratic ski counties as the other 2nd district, and so it’s not quite so Democratic, but it still loses the terrible trio and gains the Democratic parts of Colorado Springs. The district is 68% white, 3% black, and 24% Hispanic, and voted 56-43 for Obama in 2008. Sal Pace should still be able to take out Tipton here, especially because Pueblo has an even bigger influence on this district than on the other 2nd. LEAN/LIKELY D Pace vs. Tipton, LIKELY D after that.

District 3 (purple): This is the new district. It contains many Democratic-leaning areas north of Denver, including Fort Collins, Loveland, Longmont, Greeley, and the heavily-Democratic Louisville/Lafayette area. The district is 79% white, 1% black, and 16% Hispanic, and voted 56-42 for Obama in 2008. No incumbent lives here, but both ex-Rep. Betsy Markey (D-Fort Collins) and former State Senate President and losing CO-4 candidate Brandon Shaffer (D-Longmont) would be strong candidates for our side. As a side thought, wouldn’t it be hilarious if Ken Buck was the Republican nominee here? LIKELY D Markey or Shaffer vs. Generic R, SAFE D Markey or Shaffer vs. Buck.

District 4 (red): This district contains Boulder, some heavily-Democratic ski counties, and then some moderate/conservative suburbs of Denver, including Broomfield, Brighton, the western half of Arvada, and Ken Caryl/Columbine. The district is 84% white, 1% black, and 11% Hispanic, and it voted 60-39 for Obama in 2008. This is Jared Polis’s district, and it has about the same partisanship as his current district. Therefore, since he won easily this year, I’d say this district is SAFE D.

District 5 (yellow): This district in central Colorado is the other Republican district. It contains some of Douglas County, all of Teller, Fremont, and Custer Counties, and most of Park County, but most of its population is in El Paso County, in and around Colorado Springs. The district is 82% white, 4% black, and 9% Hispanic, and voted 63-36 for McCain. Doug Lamborn would romp in both the primary and the general elections here. SAFE R.

District 6 (teal): This district contains most of the city of Denver (all except its northeastern tail) and then takes in conservative areas in Arapahoe County (the two Villages) and Douglas County (Highlands Ranch). The district is 65% white, 7% black, and 22% Hispanic, and voted 70-29 for Obama in 2008. Diana DeGette is completely safe here. SAFE D.

District 7 (gray): This district takes in the southern and eastern suburbs of Denver, including Englewood, Littleton, Centennial, and Aurora. It also contains the heavily Democratic northeastern tail of Denver. This district is 60% white, 12% black, and 20% Hispanic, and voted 59-39 for Obama in 2008. Mike Coffman lives here, but he could never win here. In fact, Mike Coffman is triply screwed under this map, since he could never win the 7th, and both the 1st and 5th already have Republican incumbents. Joe Miklosi or any other Democrat in the area could hold down this district with ease. SAFE D.

District 8 (slate blue): This district contains Denver’s inner suburbs to the north and west, including Thornton, most of Westminster and Arvada, and Lakewood. The district is 69% white, 1% black, and 25% Hispanic, and voted 59-39 for Obama in 2008. Ed Perlmutter lives here, and would easily win here. SAFE D.

So there you have it. A solid 6-2 map that could be easily adjusted for population movements in 2021. If the Democrats still have the trifecta in 2021, they should draw a map like this.

Any thoughts, questions, or ideas would be greatly appreciated.

Originally posted to ProudNewEnglander on Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 09:46 AM PST.

Also republished by Colorado COmmunity.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (10+ / 0-)

    (-8.38, -4.72), CT-02 (home), new ME-01 (college) "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one." -Spock

    by ProudNewEnglander on Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 09:46:30 AM PST

  •  ah, the old spiralmander returns. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Englishlefty

    ...better the occasional faults of a government that lives in a spirit of charity, than the consistent omissions of a government frozen in the ice of its own indifference. -FDR, 1936

    by James Allen on Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 10:50:58 AM PST

  •  We were 5-2 in 2008. (0+ / 0-)

    now we are 3-4. I like your redistricting though.

    After all is said and done, a lot more is said than done.

    by Brahman Colorado on Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 10:55:24 AM PST

  •  I republished to the Colorado Community (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ChristianLeftistMD

    I thought it to be a thoughtful research. And yes we have the trifecta but will it last until 2020? With a lot of hard work.

    After all is said and done, a lot more is said than done.

    by Brahman Colorado on Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 11:00:38 AM PST

  •  I don't know that I would have said (0+ / 0-)

    that a gay congressman would "cruise" in his district.

    :)

  •  Sexy maps (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ProudNewEnglander, Englishlefty

    I had forgotten how effective it could be going around the top of the map to get Grand Junction in a GOP vote sink.  The recent maps I have made have played instead with putting Boulder and Grand Junction in the same district...the former should outweigh the latter.  However, doing it your way allows the GOP vote sinks to be more Republican, which allows everything else to be more Democratic, and creative shuffling gets all Dem seats pretty safe.

    Well done.

  •  Great Map! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    jncca

    One future note on formating, though: it's probably better to pull the partisan numbers out of the block of text.

  •  Nice maps, Colorado is pretty fun to draw (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Englishlefty, James Allen

    However if you're willing to split just a little sliver off of the northeastern Denver you can clean the rest up a lot while unpacking the 1st much more effectively:
    Photobucket
    Photobucket

    The bonus is that Coffman would almost certainly run in the 5th and Tipton in the 4th making them very easy pick ups.

    NC-06/NC-04; -9.00, -8.41; progress through pragmatism

    by sawolf on Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 03:49:00 PM PST

    •  Your map has many more county splits than mine (0+ / 0-)

      I was trying to make my maps both effective and relatively clean. Your map splits El Paso into three districts while in mine it is split into only 2. Same with Jefferson, which you split 4 ways to my 3, Broomfield, which you split 2 ways to my keeping it whole, and Grand, which you manage to split 3 ways despite it having fewer than 13,000 people.

      Also, I believe that splitting Denver is considered undesirable by many Coloradans. While I wouldn't hesitate to split Denver anyway if I had to, I was trying to show that with 7 districts, you could keep Denver whole and still make a solid 5-2 map. And with 8 districts, I split off only the northeastern tail and nothing more.

      Furthermore, Scott Tipton would not run in your 4th. He's from Cortez, in Montezuma County in the state's southwestern corner. He'd probably run in whichever district contained Montezuma County.

      Finally, even if Coffman ran in the 5th, he'd probably lose the primary to Doug Lamborn. Coffman would win Douglas County bigtime, and get destroyed by Lamborn everywhere else in the district. Are you trying to get rid of Doug Lamborn here? If so, I say don't bother. We need some right-wingers like him in Congress to remind people how crazy the Republican party is.

      (-8.38, -4.72), CT-02 (home), new ME-01 (college) "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one." -Spock

      by ProudNewEnglander on Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 05:14:14 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Fair points (0+ / 0-)

        but I think Tipton would still run in the 4th.  He represents just as much of it as Gardner and it's a safe seat, so why get destroyed in the 3rd when he has a much higher chance against Gardner.

        Same with Coffman, he really has no options since the 6th is made heavily Democratic.  Still, I think he'd run in the 5th or retire, but regardless Lamborn would still win the primary handily.

        And yes, I do have more county splits and some could be avoided without too much trouble, but the whole point of splitting El Paso 3 ways is so that you don't have one district wrap around the other.  I also don't think Colorado Dems would have much trouble with that sort of county split, but you're right that they'd be reluctant to split Denver.  I took less than 1/6th of the city though, which I don't think would be too much trouble; it just gets hard to unpack the first if it has all of the city.

        Long story short, I think my map or something very similar could have been plausibly implemented by CO Dems had we kept the trifecta, though yours no doubt could have too if they didn't care about squiggly looking districts.

        NC-06/NC-04; -9.00, -8.41; progress through pragmatism

        by sawolf on Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 06:48:53 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

      •  Splitting Denver (0+ / 0-)

        Splitting Denver is hardly unprecedented. For example, in the 1970s (when Colorado only had five districts) Tim Wirth had a district consisting of Boulder, Jeffco, and several predominantly Latino neighborhoods in west Denver. A couple of times west Denver provided his entire margin of victory.

      •   (0+ / 0-)

        Splitting Denver is hardly unprecedented. For example, in the 1970s (when Colorado only had five districts) Tim Wirth had a district consisting of Boulder, Jeffco, and several predominantly Latino neighborhoods in west Denver. A couple of times west Denver provided his entire margin of victory.

    •  Airport (0+ / 0-)

      The appendage on northeast Denver is the airport. While it's in the city limits, it is, of course, virtually unpopulated. I don't think anyone would care which district it is in.

  •  I like it (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ChristianLeftistMD

    I worry about drawing a map w/o population shifts for 2020 because we're expected to grow by 900k-1 million people.

    My hardcore partisan side would want this out of us having the trifecta, I just have trouble seeing Democrats going for it so boldly.  I do like how you minimized county splits too!  I'd vote for your map over mine if I was in the leg. for sure.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site